Flight sequence for which aircraft?

This is the Forum of Squadrons, Crews and Aircraft of Bomber Command & Related Luftwaffe personnel and aircraft.
Post Reply
R5868
Flying Officer
Flying Officer
Posts: 210
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:45 am
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Contact:

Flight sequence for which aircraft?

Post by R5868 »

These sheets were in my uncle's logbook. They appear to be for a twin engine aircraft. Could they be for an Anson or an Oxford?

Image

Image

Kerry
http://www.anzacsons.com
150 and 467/463 Squadrons
kookabat
Flying Officer
Flying Officer
Posts: 150
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:28 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Re: Flight sequence for which aircraft?

Post by kookabat »

Looks to me like a fairly generic set of checklists for a twin of the era Kerry - did the Oxford have power-operated undercarriage retraction or was it also a case of "get the bloke in the other seat to wind the handle 1,528 times" like the Anson?

I guess the answer may lie in which twin-engined aircraft Eric flew first. This is pure guesswork, but... if he flew (say) the Anson first, presumably it was at SFTS and it would have been the second aircraft type (after Max's favourite the Tiger Moth) he had ever encountered. So at that stage in his career flying in general is still quite a new thing. I can imagine a conscientious student writing out a checklist like this one, but a more seasoned heavy bomber pilot might not be so careful. Flown one twin (of the era), flown 'em all, right?

You might like to contact a mob like the Nhill Aviation Heritage Centre - they're restoring an Anson (very slowly) and might have documentation that could confirm, perhaps, the engine pressure and fuel capacities etc.
Remembering the crew of 467 Sqn Lancaster LM475 PO-B Jan-May 1944
www.somethingverybig.com
User avatar
ME453
Wing Commander
Wing Commander
Posts: 719
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:37 pm
Location: Dorset but nearly Somerset and Wilts
Contact:

Re: Flight sequence for which aircraft?

Post by ME453 »

I'd go for an Oxford Kerry, definitely can't be an Anson because, as Adam said, the u/c had to be hand-wound up and down. Very interesting to read the sequences though - again I agree with Adam that it's the kind of thing a conscientious pilot new to a type would do to try to ingrain the procedure (heavens, it's even what I've done recently with my flying!).

Knowing the correct sequences by heart is of course vital. I remember reading in Geoffrey Wellum's excellent book "First Light" how one of his trainee colleagues was killed in a Harvard just after take-off because he forgot to uncage his compass, he flew into a hill on a night exercise.
Max
www.ordinarycrew.co.uk
Dedicated to the crew of Lancaster ME453 467 squadron
Post Reply