Aircraft Identification Challenge No: 164

Challenges may include WW2 Operations, Bomber Command & Luftwaffe Aircraft and Parts.
'Aircraft Identification Challenge' = AIC
'Operation Identification Challenge' = OIC
'Parts Identification Challenge' = PIC
Stirling Project
Group Captain
Group Captain
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:05 pm
Location: St Neots, Cambridgeshire

Re: Aircraft Identification Challenge No: 164

Post by Stirling Project »

Soooooo close!!!!! but not quite :D
User avatar
AlanW
Air Commodore
Air Commodore
Posts: 1359
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:11 am
Location: West Cornwall

Re: Aircraft Identification Challenge No: 164

Post by AlanW »

Johns done the leg work, but i'll try going for a Boeing 299.
There is no paralell in warfare, to such courage and determination in the face of danger, over so long a period. Such devotion, should never be forgotten.
Stirling Project
Group Captain
Group Captain
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:05 pm
Location: St Neots, Cambridgeshire

Re: Aircraft Identification Challenge No: 164

Post by Stirling Project »

Nope! :P
User avatar
AlanW
Air Commodore
Air Commodore
Posts: 1359
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:11 am
Location: West Cornwall

Re: Aircraft Identification Challenge No: 164

Post by AlanW »

Stirling Project wrote:Nope! :P
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
294 XB-15 :)
There is no paralell in warfare, to such courage and determination in the face of danger, over so long a period. Such devotion, should never be forgotten.
User avatar
K4KittyCrew
Air Chief Marshal (RAAF)
Air Chief Marshal (RAAF)
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:55 am
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland - Australia

Re: Aircraft Identification Challenge No: 164

Post by K4KittyCrew »

Stirling Project wrote:Soooooo close!!!!! but not quite :D
Here are all of what I could find, with the earliest models, first listed ...........
294 XB-15 - USAAC:
299 B-17 Flying Fortress -
299 XB-38 -
299B Y1B-17 Flying Fortress - USAAC:
299H B-17C Flying Fortress - USAAC:
299M B-17B Flying Fortress - USAAC:
299O B-17E Flying Fortress - USAAF:
299O B-17F Flying Fortress - USAAF:
299O XB-40 - USAAF:
299O XC-108 - USAAF:
299P B-17G Flying Fortress
- F-BEEC -
- USAAF:

299P B-17G Flying Fortress - USAAF:
299P ETB-17G Flying Fortress - G-BEDF - USAF:
299P VB-17G Flying Fortress -
299P SB-17H Flying Fortress - USAAF:
299P PB-1G Flying Fortress -
299P PB-1W Flying Fortress
299P Flying Fortress Mk.III - RAF:
299T Flying Fortress Mk.I - RAF:
299Z B-17G

Cheers,
John
K for Kitty Crew - Winthorpe, 1661 HCU's - stirlingaircraftsoc.raf38group.org/
630 Squadron - East Kirkby
" There is nothing glorious about war with the exception of those who served us so valiantly"
Stirling Project
Group Captain
Group Captain
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:05 pm
Location: St Neots, Cambridgeshire

Re: Aircraft Identification Challenge No: 164

Post by Stirling Project »

time to go back to basics chaps, remember i asked for the nickname as a bonus. You are so nearly there with one of the aircraft in the list above :twisted:

John L
Stirling Project
Group Captain
Group Captain
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:05 pm
Location: St Neots, Cambridgeshire

Re: Aircraft Identification Challenge No: 164

Post by Stirling Project »

And there was one only of this type.....
Stirling Project
Group Captain
Group Captain
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:05 pm
Location: St Neots, Cambridgeshire

Re: Aircraft Identification Challenge No: 164

Post by Stirling Project »

And not used for it's original purpose and was given a different designation
User avatar
PAFG
Group Captain
Group Captain
Posts: 803
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:34 pm
Location: Wiltshire, UK

Re: Aircraft Identification Challenge No: 164

Post by PAFG »

Is it the B15 Grandpappy?





If it is, my apologies to John who's done the hard work, I just crossed the line at the last minute :oops:
Stirling Project
Group Captain
Group Captain
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:05 pm
Location: St Neots, Cambridgeshire

Re: Aircraft Identification Challenge No: 164

Post by Stirling Project »

Aaargh, so very close.......
Post Reply